Breadcrumbs

A Performance Management Framework


Introduction

Performance management is comprised of four major sets of activities:

  1. Defining objectives and standards
  2. Allocating resources and taking actions to achieve the objectives
  3. Analyzing and reporting on results, and
  4. Taking necessary corrective actions to mitigate risk and ensure success.

Organizations typically manage their long-term strategic performance independently from their short-term operational performance. A frequent, unintentional, result of this approach is that strategic objectives are not achieved and operational objectives are. This occurs because:

  1. Operational objectives are not aligned with the strategic objectives
  2. Resource allocation priorities are given to short-term needs
  3. Most of management’s time is focused on the urgency of achieving quarterly results, and
  4. Short term success masks the risk to achieving strategy

  With the advent of the Balanced Scorecard for strategy management and Lean Six Sigma for process improvement, many organizations are sensing that there is potential for common ground between strategic and operational performance management but are struggling to articulate exactly what that common ground is and how it works.

For example, organizations working on implementing the Balanced Scorecard strive to operationalize the strategy so that employees can see how their day-to-day work activities contribute to achieving the strategy. Similarly, when selecting Lean Six Sigma projects to work on, a frequent question from the project selection committee is, “how does this project align to the strategy?”

 

This article introduces a Performance Management Framework (“Framework”) that provides a common ground for discussing and answering these questions and a foundation upon which a successful performance management program can be established. The Framework’s interface between its strategic and operational aspects will also be discussed.

The Framework Figure 1 below lays out the Framework and shows how it aligns with the Deming improvement cycle of Plan-Do-Check-Act. The Framework also aligns with the four sets of performance management activities identified in the first paragraph of this article. These sets of performance management activities are called phases in the Framework. Shortcomings in implementing various aspects of these phases leads to the strategy achievement failures identified in the second paragraph.

 

Performance Management Framework - Figure 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                 

  

                       Figure 1-The Performance Management Framework

Each of the four phases of the Framework have strategic and operational components. These components have the same name in each of their respective phases. The components are called Objectives in the Plan phase, Projects in the Do phase, Reports in the Check phase and Reviews in the Act phase.

Planning is the phase where performance objectives and standards are defined, articulated and communicated to the rest of the organization. Strategic planning is the process of establishing an organization’s long term (typically three to five year) goals and an approach for achieving them. The outcome of the process is a set of strategic objectives and performance standards for evaluating achievement progress. Operations

planning is the process of establishing an organization’s short term (less than three years) goals and an approach for achieving them. The outcome of the process is a set of objectives and performance standards which describe how the organization’s resources will be allocated and utilized in support of the long-term strategy.

The Do phase is where action is taken to achieve the stated objectives at the targeted performance levels. Two examples are a project to implement a new technological capability in support of the strategy and a project to improve on-time delivery performance. Action may also be taken in the form of corrective action when progress is not being made at the desired rate. This is indicated by the feedback loop from the Act phase. An important aspect of the Do phase is the allocation of resources and authorization of expenditures related to the projects selected.

A facet of operations that must be considered within the Do phase is Daily Operations. Daily Operations are what the organization does on a daily basis to meet its business needs; things such as designing, delivering, taking orders and closing the books. These are processes that are executed in support of operational objectives. The performance of these processes is measured, reported on and reviewed. Based on the reviews,  process improvement projects are undertaken, when necessary, to improve process performance.

The Check phase is for measuring results and analyzing performance. Measuring describes what happened and the analysis describes why it happened and makes recommendations for management action. When describing the why, it is important to look not only at the related measures but at other factors such as economic and political situations, supplier and customer
viability, and social and cultural needs and events.

As the name implies, the Act phase is where action is taken by management based on the performance analysis provided in the Check phase. Some of the possible actions that could be taken are authorizing corrective actions to mitigate risk, communicating decisions to the affected groups and individuals, authorizing a change in priorities that will be acted upon in the Do phase, and recommending a change in objectives that will be acted upon in the Plan phase.

The System Interfaces

The description of the four phases above sounds a lot like any other Deming Cycle-based management methodology. The difference with the Performance Management Framework is that it considers the management of performance to be a system with two major components: strategic and operational.

Just like any system, the interface between the strategic and operational components of each phase of the Performance Management Framework is where success or failure is determined. The Framework identifies the practices and methods used to manage the strategic-operational interface within each phase of the Framework.

In the Plan phase, Maps are used to define the relationship between strategic and operational objectives. While there may be local operational objectives that do not necessarily have a  relationship to the strategy, the bulk of the operational objectives should be short-term, local versions of the long-term strategic objectives. Maps, strategic and operational, provide a proven and easy-to-use mechanism for articulating and managing the objectives and their interrelationships and alignment.

In the Do phase, a Portfolio is used to collect, prioritize, select, authorize and manage strategic, operational and process improvement projects. This is perhaps the most difficult interface to develop and manage as most organizations have existing, well-developed, separate practices for managing strategic, operational and process improvement projects. A portfolio approach introduces the concept of viewing all projects together, as a whole, and making selection decisions based on the whole rather than on the three individual groups. This is done within the constraints of budget limits and resource availability as well the management established selection criteria and weighting factors. Having a well-managed portfolio ensures an effective balance between strategic and operational projects while maintaining the desired level of performance in daily operations.

For the Check phase, Scorecards are used to document and report on operational and strategic measures and performance analysis and, in particular, the roll-up relationship between operational and strategic measures. Well-planned scorecards allow a proper focus on strategic and operational performance measures.

Finally, Governance is used in the Act phase to establish policy and provide forums – typically, operational and strategy review meetings - for management risk analysis and decision-making. It is not sufficient to only have a calendar of events for strategic and operational reviews. In addition, a management policy of open and frequent communication between strategy and operational management functions is essential. Governance focused on 2-way open communication of strategic and operational priorities and issues along with an integrated management calendar ensures that a) decisions from the strategy reviews flow effectively to the appropriate operational entity and b) decisions and issues related to strategy from the operations reviews become part of the agenda for the strategic reviews.

Conclusion

Performance success means that an organization’s short and long-term goals are achieved and its daily operations function smoothly. Effective performance management must address both the strategic and operational aspects of performance. The Framework presented in this article provides a foundation for successful performance management by utilizing a proven improvement management construct (Plan-Do-Check-Act) and establishing a well-defined interface between the strategic and operational components.